TFI Releases 2021 Policy Priorities

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) today released its list of 2021 public policy priorities for working with the Biden Administration, as well as a closely divided 117th Congress.

“Our number one goal is to ensure the fertilizer industry is able to continue feeding the world sustainably within a legislative and regulatory environment that allows for industry growth and innovation,” said TFI President & CEO Corey Rosenbusch. “The policy priorities identified and approved by our members illustrate the industry’s focus on the safety and security of employees and the communities in which they operate, a commitment to environmental stewardship, and the efficient use of energy.” 

TFI’s priorities are broken down into six key areas: safety and security; energy and economic growth; environment; innovation; trade; and transportation and infrastructure.

“While safety and security are always the number one priority for our members, the environment is also at the top of the list. Specifically, the important role that the fertilizer supply chain plays in being part of the solution to address the many challenges of a changing climate,” Rosenbusch continued. “The fertilizer industry is essential to our modern way of life and our members have made minimizing the environmental impact of crop nutrients a key pillar of how they operate. We want to see that reflected in public policy. It is absolutely critical that any climate change policies or initiatives must not impact our ability to provide farmers with the crop nutrients they need.”

Rosenbusch says that some of that is offense and some of that is defense. An example of offense is TFI’s work to promote the important role agricultural retailers have in providing agronomic assistance and expertise to farmers looking to implement   sustainable fertilizer practices such as the 4Rs, which is utilizing the right source of fertilizer, at the right rate, at the right time and in the right place. “The 4Rs are a scientifically proven method of getting maximum crop yield while significantly reducing environmental impacts, such as run-off, and any state nutrient loss reduction plan must include the 4Rs as a backbone to handling crop nutrients.” Agricultural retailers are also well-positioned to assist their farmer customers interested in participating in voluntary, market-based carbon markets that incentivize the implementation of fertilizer best management practices on the farm which are proven to help sequester carbon in the soil. 

On defense, Rosenbusch says it is mostly about the unintended consequences of policies. “On the issue of greenhouse gas emissions, U.S. production of nitrogen fertilizers is both energy-intensive and trade exposed. We need to make sure that policies are not put into place that send production to areas of the world that do not use more efficient production methods and lack the same type of environmental protections we have in the U.S. Greenhouse gas emissions are a global issue and discouraging efficient production in the U.S. in favor of a dirtier process overseas actually harms the environment more than it helps.”

Tony Will, Chairman of the TFI Board of Directors and President & CEO of CF Industries, Inc., added, “The fertilizer industry in the United States is proud of its legacy of ensuring the food security for our fellow citizens and for the world in a sustainable manner. Our public policy priorities are a roadmap to build on these contributions and to help address the challenges before us, particularly for the environment. We look forward to working with the Biden administration and Congress on solutions that advance our shared commitment to a better and healthier world.”

While TFI will be heavily focused on environmental policy, the issues of trade, infrastructure and safety & security all are critical to the industry, as well. “TFI supported the USMCA and are hopeful that the Biden Administration will be seeking to update existing and creating new trade agreements that promote open markets and fair competition,” Rosenbusch continued. “Trade is incredibly important specifically to our industry, but also to our grower customers that are quite literally feeding the world and need fair access to new and expanded markets.”

Infrastructure is critical to the fertilizer industry because of the just-in-time nature of demand. “Fertilizer needs to be delivered to growers exactly when and where they need it and there is not much room for error. When the optimal window opens   it has to happen, and the industry must  be ready and ensure the materials are all in place,” explained Rosenbusch. “Bottlenecks due to road or bridge closures or delays because of crumbling locks and dams have the potential to be devastating to applying crop nutrients when they are most needed for healthy growth and strong yields.”

TFI will use its member-driven public policy priorities to educate policymakers on the realities of an essential industry that is responsible for half of all food grown around the world. “Our industry is vital to ensuring our farmers can enrich the soil and grow the crops that feed the world and its growing population,” Rosenbusch concluded. “We look forward to working with the Biden Administration and the new Congress.”

TFI’s full list of 2021 public policy priorities can be found here.

 

 

###

The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) is the leading voice of the nation’s fertilizer industry. Tracing its roots back to 1883, TFI’s membership includes fertilizer producers, wholesalers, retailers and trading firms. TFI’s full-time staff, based in Washington, D.C., serves its members through legislative, educational, technical, economic information and public communication programs. Find more information about TFI online at TFI.org and follow us on Twitter at @Fertilizer_Inst. Learn more about TFI’s nutrient stewardship initiatives at nutrientstewardship.org and on Twitter at @4rnutrients.

TFI & Biostimulant Coalition Unite to Focus on Regulatory Approval Improvements

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) today announced that it and the Biostimulant Coalition have reached a formal agreement to form a “Biostimulant Council” and work together to advance policy and regulatory frameworks that increase biostimulant market access and encourage research and innovation. The Biostimulant Coalition is a non-profit group of interested parties cooperating to proactively address regulatory and legislative issues involving biological or naturally derived additives, including but not limited to bacterial or microbial inoculants, biochemical materials, amino acids, humic acids, fulvic acid, seaweed extract and other similar materials. The group was formed in 2011.
 
“We are happy to welcome the Biostimulant Coalition under the TFI umbrella,” said TFI President & CEO Corey Rosenbusch. “Biostimulants are an important and growing area of crop nutrition. The Biostimulant Coalition has achieved great success as the voice of an emerging industry and we are excited about the potential to achieve even more with the additional resources of TFI fully behind the effort.”
 
“The partnership with TFI will provide the Biostimulant Coalition with all the tools we need to continue serving the membership we have, as well as growing those offerings,” agreed Biostimulant Coalition Executive Director, David Beaudreau, Jr. “TFI brings to the table a high functioning team of professionals and a full suite of legal, policy, regulatory, and communications resources.”
 
“The number one issue facing the biostimulant industry is not having a regulatory approval process that allows biostimulants to be marketed to or utilized by farmers,” concluded Rosenbusch. “TFI will be leading the way to change that and ensure the industry has a workable biostimulant definition, products have an approval path to market and scientifically defensible claims can be analyzed by growers to evaluate use on their crops.” 

###

The Fertilizer Institute (TFI)
The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) is the leading voice of the nation’s fertilizer industry. Tracing its roots back to 1883, TFI’s membership includes fertilizer producers, wholesalers, retailers, and trading firms. TFI’s full-time staff, based in Washington, D.C., serves its members through legislative, educational, technical, economic information and public communication programs. Find more information about TFI online at TFI.org. Learn more about TFI’s nutrient stewardship initiatives at nutrientstewardship.org.  

The Fertilizer Institute Partners with EPA, USDA to Advance Next Generation Fertilizer Development and Use

WASHINGTON, Aug. 26, 2020 – Today, The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) joined with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in launching the Next Gen Fertilizer Challenges, which aims to accelerate the development of innovative fertilizer product technologies and to increase the use of existing enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs) that maintain or increase crop yields and reduce environmental impacts to air, land, and water.

“Today’s fertilizer industry is built upon decades of innovation that have led us to a modern and efficient supply chain that has helped farmers increase yields while fine tuning their fertilizer use,” said Corey Rosenbusch, TFI President and CEO. “However, there is always improvement to be made, which is why we are excited to partner with the federal government and others in this challenge to spur the industry’s creativity in finding sustainable solutions for tomorrow’s fertilizer industry.”

Fertilizers facilitate the growth of crops at yields that provide sustained global food production. However, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers applied without consideration of the principles of 4R Nutrient Stewardship (source, rate, time, and place) can have harmful effects on environment and human health. EEF and other new product technologies and formulations control fertilizer release or alter reactions that can increase nutrient uptake by the plant and reduce nutrient losses to the environment. EEFs and other related technologies can be an important addition to a conservation practice system that helps reduce row crop agriculture impacts on the environment, while maintaining or increasing agricultural productivity and profitability.

The EEF Partnership and Competition includes two challenges. The EEFs: Environmental and Agronomic Challenge and the Next Gen Fertilizer Innovation Challenge. Submission details are available on the EPA website and winners will be announced in December 2020 (Existing EEFs) and February 2020 (Next Gen Fertilizer Innovation).

  • EEFs: Environmental and Agronomic Challenge: This challenge aims to identify existing EEFs currently on or near-market that meet or exceed certain environmental and agro-economic criteria. Submissions are due October 30, 2020.
  • Next Gen Fertilizer Innovations Challenge: This challenge aims to identify concepts for novel technologies for fertilizers that can reduce the environmental effects from modern agriculture while maintaining or increasing crop yields. Submissions to the Next Gen Fertilizer Innovations Challenge are not near-market and may include EEFs and other product technologies used with or in combination with commercial fertilizers. Submissions are due November 30, 2020.

Winners of the EEFs: Environmental and Agronomic Challenge will receive scientific evaluation and recognition from EPA, USDA, and other partners and participants; advancement to a greenhouse trial; and, pending greenhouse trial results and available funds, advancement to field trials.

Winners of the Next Gen Fertilizer Innovations Challenge will receive a minimum award of $10,000 per winner from a total prize purse of $40,000 and be invited to a showcasing event, where winners of both challenges will share ideas and spark innovation.

An informational webinar is scheduled for September 24, 2020. Registration details are available on the EPA website.

EPA and USDA are working in collaboration with TFI, the International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), and the National Corn Growers Association (NCGA). The challenges were developed with input from stakeholders such as corn grower representatives, fertilizer companies, university researchers, and environmental and industry NGOs.

#

The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) is the leading voice of the nation’s fertilizer industry. Tracing its roots back to 1883, TFI’s membership includes fertilizer producers, wholesalers, retailers and trading firms. TFI’s full-time staff, based in Washington, D.C., serves its members through legislative, educational, technical, economic information and public communication programs. Find more information about TFI online at TFI.org. Learn more about TFI’s nutrient stewardship initiatives at nutrientstewardship.org.

The State of Fertilizer Sustainability

In the past few months, we’ve seen the business community make some major announcements regarding their role in combating large societal challenges. Larry Fink, CEO of the investment firm BlackRock, acknowledged that climate change is “driving a profound reassessment of risk,” and therefore they plan to realign a significant portion of their capital to match their investors’ values.

Energy giant BP announced last week that they seek to achieve net zero emissions by 2050 on not just their operations, but also on the upstream use of their products.

Now, these two companies (and several others like them) might not be who most of us turn toward to solve environmental challenges. Historically, that has fallen to NGOs, government, and academia. However, we live in a changing world that’s being turned on its head.

In January, the public relations firm Edelman released the 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer, which tracks the trends that influence and reflect people’s trust in the four major societal institutions: government, business, media and NGOs. This year’s report revealed that none of these four institutions is trusted by the public, which stems from our fear of the future and the role these institutions play in it.

It’s a wake-up call that maybe BlackRock and BP are listening to and one TFI is heeding as well.

Last month, TFI released it’s fifth State of the Fertilizer Industry Report – or unofficially the industry’s sustainability report. The report has been tracking industry performance on various environmental, social, and economic indicators for five years. And I’m pleased to say the industry is making progress!

Some of the highlights include:

  • The industry is more than twice as safe as industry peers when compared to benchmark data from the Department of Labor.
  • The fertilizer industry delivers more than $130 billion in economic impact in the United States.
  • Total energy use per nutrient ton of fertilizer produced decreased 3 percent from the prior year.
  • The industry captured more than 4.5 times the greenhouse gas emissions that were captured in 2013. These captured emissions were then used for other industrial purposes.
  • Nitrogen producers are using half the amount of water per nutrient ton produced than they did in 2013.

The report showcases data on all segments of the fertilizer industry from fertilizer use on the farm, the impact on people and communities, energy and environment, and transportation. For the first time this year, TFI is able to report that nearly 6 million tons of recycled materials were used in the production fertilizer.

And while the report contains more data, there’s still much work to be done to make progress on these metrics. Last year, TFI’s Board of Directors approved a new organization strategic plan. And in a sign that this industry also “gets it,” one of the three pillars of the plan is a commitment to the environment.

The board identified their commitment to reducing the environmental footprint of the production and use of fertilizer. And building on the successes highlighted through five years of reporting, the industry will continue to invest in more efficient production facilities that use less water and energy while emitting fewer GHGs.

On the use side, the industry continues to expand the reach of the 4R Nutrient Stewardship initiative. This past year the state of Florida implemented the 4R Certification program, which certifies fertilizer retailers and crop consultants – those who apply or make fertilizer recommendations – are following business practices in accordance with 4R Nutrient Stewardship principles. Similar efforts are underway in a number of other states. All of which helps to significantly reduce and prevent fertilizer from running off fields into the water supply.

The TFI staff have also been working diligently over the past several years to quantify the benefits of 4R practice implementation on the farm. And I’m excited to say that we’re making progress on this front as well. We know that cost is an important consideration for farmers when thinking about any practice change. To answer these questions, we have developed a host of case studies showcasing how farmers across the United States have seen costs go down, yield go up, and environmental impact lessened through using 4R-based practices. You can learn more at 4Rfarming.org.

The fertilizer industry employs more than 103,000 people in the United States. To capture their work and impact, the State of the Industry Report features interviews with employees across the value chain, including those who partner with the industry on research and stewardship initiatives. Take a listen and hear from the industry in their own voice.

Please head to the TFI website at fertilizerreport.org to learn all about how the fertilizer industry is contributing to a more sustainable future.

Increasing Interest in Fertilizers Bodes Well for Industry

This article was originally published in the January/February 2020 issue of Argus Media’s Fertilizer Focus magazine.

With 2019 in the books, fertilizer industry leaders note the realities of a year that dealt with bad weather, worldwide political challenges and routine market cycles. This in no way dispels their optimism for 2020 and beyond. In fact, they’re realistic that some years will be challenging, while others will deliver more opportunities than can be expected.  

Data for the fifth State of the Fertilizer Industry Report is being verified by The Fertilizer Institute (TFI) as this issue of Fertilizer Focus goes to press. It will be presented in mid-February during The Fertilizer Institute’s Annual Business Conference. Initial observations of the data confirm experts’ observations that the long-term direction of the fertilizer industry is on an upward trajectory.

Magnus Ankarstrand is president of Yara North America. He says a strong nitrogen market has given rise to an increase in nitrogen production from 2016 onwards, as well as improved production efficiency.

“We’ve seen an increase in production, particularly on the nitrogen side that affects us,” he says. “Capacity in North America was achieved fairly quickly, but additional capacity in China and North Africa has followed, although it is not likely additional nitrogen projects make sense in the near term. For Yara, it’s been important to ensure we continue to make our production more efficient, such as decreasing gas consumption per ton of ammonia produced.

“It’s also been important to expand our downstream distribution,” Ankarstrand adds. “Our ability to distribute our products to cooperatives and retailers worldwide and have infrastructure and alternative outlets in different markets to deliver products all over the world has been extremely important to us, in addition to delivering superior knowledge about crop nutrition to farmers.”

Mike Hamilton, vice president, business director for Plant Nutrients at AdvanSix, says while economics for growers continue to be a struggle, it’s important to keep market cycles in mind.

“We continue to see market cyclicity for fertilizer and crops, in general,” he says. “While today’s market is fairly weak, there is a growing need for more food and grain. I think most market participants expect things to rebound.”

 

Market challenges, industry issues are opportunities

This aligns with observations of The Fertilizer Institute. In addition to normal market fluctuations, there has been a transformational shift in interest of the fertilizer industry from insiders and outsiders alike. This signals an overall positive for upcoming years.

“Stakeholder interest in the fertilizer industry continues to increase, whether that focus stems from water quality, climate change or general sustainability/sustainable sourcing considerations by the food supply chain,” Lara Moody, TFI vice president, stewardship and sustainability, says. “Stakeholders increasingly look to industry retail members as farmers’ advisers to bring about change that leads to reduced nutrient loss and sustainably grown products. Manufacturers and producers feel pressure each time our products are linked to algal blooms, eutrophication, ammonia losses and climate change.“

Ankarstrand concurs.

“In the last few years, especially the last couple, there has been a significant increase in the whole sustainability discussion around agriculture,” he says. “This interest is accelerating. The increased focus on the carbon footprint of agriculture in general, and especially fertilizer issues, such as leaching, runoff and water management have become big issues.

“Quite clearly these are becoming big topics, but what’s important for us as a company and for the industry as a whole, is to provide a solution that solves these issues with current technology using available methods, such as the 4Rs,” he adds.

 

Addressing issues now

As noted in previous editions of the State of the Industry Report, the industry is ahead of the game when it comes to advances. The 2019 edition is expected to deliver the same.

“Some of the trends we’ve measured through members are important points we are able to use in advocacy,” Moody says. “Since 2014, the industry has continued to increase the percentage of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions captured during nutrient production, our safety record remains well below that of our peers and we’ve seen a continued increase in enhanced efficiency fertilizer use.”

On-farm adoption of 4R practices continues to progress. TFI is developing case studies to help growers see how the 4Rs can benefit individual operations’ bottom line.

In 2017, TFI conducted research to understand what the barriers and consideration farmers face when implementing practice change. Moody says cost was overwhelmingly identified as the top consideration. She adds that while cost is simple to identify, it is more complex to show farmers the economic benefits of practice change.

“Because practices are linked to management systems, costs from equipment changes and fuel usage to labor and changing input costs must be considered. Cost savings or increases linked to practice change come from a variety of management decisions. Understanding where they originate puts more information in the hands of farmers and crop advisers. By developing case studies in multiple geographies and various cropping systems, we hope farmers will be able to see examples that look somewhat like their own operations, Moody says.”

In addition to TFI’s own research on the benefits of 4R Nutrient Stewardship, its members conduct research to improve use of their products. AdvanSix has examined the agronomic benefits of split-applying nitrogen and sulfur. Hamilton says they have found that performing a pre-plant or at-plating application and then applying ammonium sulfate later in the cycle, gets the nutrients where and when the plants need them. Plus, there are fewer environmental losses.

“This improves grower economics because they’re getting more efficient plant nutrition,” he says. “This is important for the industry and society as a whole.”

As Yara has increased production capacity, it also found a way to tap by-product hydrogen from other producers in the Freeport, Texas, area and use it to produce in a sense, hydrogen-free ammonia.

Ankarstrand and other company leaders are looking ahead, too. Yara has invested in incubator farms in Alabama and California in the United States and in Saskatchewan in Canada. All represent a substantial investment into crop nutrition knowledge and research and development. However, the California farm includes tree crops, so the commitment is strong for a long-term, year-over-year study of nutrient use.

For the last two years, AdvanSix has issued its own sustainability report. Hamilton says it is a comprehensive document that looks at issues from an overall business perspective and supports the company’s goal of being transparent.

 

Understanding of existing nutrients expanding

Opportunities for nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium will continue to grow, as well as those for other nutrients, especially sulfur.

“In the last 10 to 15 years, we’ve seen an increase in awareness of the understanding of the need for sulfur,” Hamilton says. “It has accelerated a bit more because over the same period of time, we’ve seen a significant reduction in SO2 emissions from sources like coal-fired power plants. Because of this, US sulfur deposition has decreased and the need for growers to invest in sulfur nutrition is increasing. We see this with sulfur demand.”

It’s not just the United States, Hamilton says.

“We don’t believe China and India use enough sulfur,” he says “Even soybeans in the United States could benefit from more sulfur. We’re conducting research on this now. Most of our research is completed in partnerships with agricultural universities. Their researchers perform great work and growers look to university researchers as non-biased advisers.”

 

Opportunities abound

These advances and changes in thinking create opportunities for all industry players. TFI’s Moody says most leaders are embracing them from the top down.

“At TFI, we have ramped up 4R efforts for the last decade. We have been able to take ownership of our part of the nutrient loss problem and more importantly, own a solution. The 4Rs allow us to lead with science and bring a wide range of stakeholders with us from state and federal agencies, academia, conservation and commodity groups. We’ve also ramped up our knowledge of industry efforts with the data collection required for the State of the Industry Report. It gives us awareness of multiple efforts across the fertilizer supply chain that we use to inform our advocacy efforts and decisions, as well as our stakeholders. Industry members can also use the data to perform internal assessments relative to industry averages.”

The key is continued cooperation, Hamilton says.

“Part of our challenge is to continue to communicate,” he says. “Fertilizer is important to ensure people have enough to eat. How we communicate its relevance will be key to success at all levels.”

Aiding this much-needed communication is one use of the new State of the Industry Report, Moody says.

“Sustainable food choices, water pollution and climate change remain at the forefront of discussions and in the media,” she says. “We also hear more about environmental, social and governance (ESG) reporting for publicly traded companies. Our 4R and State of the Industry Report are tools the fertilizer industry can use as they navigate these issues.”

TFI Statement on Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s August 8, 2019, Status Report

Agriculture is at the frontline of adaptation to climate change. In the last twelve months, the record-breaking flood events and challenging precipitation frequencies in the Midwest challenged farmers and the fertilizer industry to adapt to a dramatically shortened fall field work and spring planting season.  

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report released today cautions that land must remain productive to feed a rising world population and highlights the importance of fertilizer application rate and timing to maintain production potential and reduce environmental quality impairment. We believe that the efficiency of fertilizer use is central to the goal of successful adaptation to changes in environmental conditions. 

The fertilizer industry is committed to the sustainable use of its products using the 4R Nutrient Stewardship framework (use of the right fertilizer source, at the right rate, the right time, and in the right place). This science-based, site-specific approach is contributing to incredible progress in minimizing the impact of fertilizer use has on our nation’s air and water resources. Since 1980, U.S. farmers have more than doubled corn production using just 6.9 percent more fertilizer. Considering that emissions from agricultural operations have been relatively flat since 1990, this is tremendous progress.

Still, there is much more work to be done. Science-based decision making should be the foundation for the adoption of climate smart technologies and practices for sustainable agriculture and global food production. The 4R Research Fund, which is supported by the fertilizer industry and other key stakeholders supports integral research and provides information to help farmers maintain the cycle of continuous improvement.

Beyond farm fields, minimizing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is also a priority for companies that produce fertilizer. The industry captures CO2 emitted during ammonia production and re-uses it during the production of urea, another nitrogen fertilizer. Excess CO2 captured from fertilizer production is also recycled for other industrial use, such as enhanced oil recovery and the carbonization of soft drinks.

In 2017, the industry captured and re-used 7.5 million metric tons – which is 24 percent of all GHGs emitted by the industry throughout the year.  This is a dramatic increase compared to 2013, when the industry captured and re-used 9 percent of its GHGs.